Vision for Change: Batta Fulkerson is Giving People a Reason to View Personal Injury Law Firms Under a New... Be the Missing Piece: Marketing Your Niche Law Practice: Marketing a niche practice (especially in a small firm) has its challenges. Although a... 20 Traits of the 100%- Capable Rainmaker: What does it take to be a great rainmaker, able to generate millions of dollars in... How Meditation Helped My Law Practice And Why I Think It Could Help Yours: Last year, I made equity partner at my Firm. In this blog, I have promised to tell some... Unlocking the Talents of the Millennial Lawyer: “What can I do to convince you to stay?” - So asked a senior partner during a long... Digital Marketing Trends in 2018 and Beyond: If you have seen a slump in your recent marketing efforts, you need to evaluate what you... 11 “More” SEO Specialists Share Their Best Tips for Lawyers: This is the question we posed to more than 50 SEO specialists who have done SEO for... Community News – July 2018: Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek is pleased to announce that Arezoo Jamshidi has been... Riding A Wave of Wage and Hour Class Action Litigation: California’s Leading Wage and Hour Class Action Lawyer, San Diego’s own Bill Turley... An Attorney’s Guide To Closing A Law Firm: Just like any other professional, sometimes lawyers choose to close their practices. The...
Executive Presentations-468x60-1

Survey Finds Slow Adoption of Alternative Fee Arrangements for Legal Services

This just in from ALM: In spite of all the buzz, an increase in the use of AFAs is proving to be much more gradual than forecast in aftermath of 2008-2010 recession. [See the chart below for the reasons behind the slow adoption of AFAs.]

According to results from a new survey conducted by ALM Legal Intelligence, alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) for legal services — billing methods based on metrics other than an hourly rate — are becoming more pervasive, but still failing to gain the traction that was predicted by industry experts in recent years.

The survey report, “Speaking Different Languages: Alternative Fee Arrangements for Law Firms and Legal Departments,” indicates that only 6 percent of law firm respondents used an AFA in 2011 for more than half of their legal work, with the majority (67 percent) using AFAs for less than one quarter of their billing. Similarly, only 12 percent of legal department respondents said they used AFAs for more than half of the legal work they assigned to outside counsel in 2011.

Perhaps even more telling about the lackluster adoption of AFAs is that 6 percent of legal departments and 17 percent of law firms did not even know what percentage of their legal work was billed using a method other than the billable hour or discounting.

These results are among the thought-provoking findings of the survey, which was conducted last month by ALM Legal Intelligence and sponsored by LexisNexis® CounselLink®. To download a free copy of the report, please go to http://almlegalintel.com/Surveys/AFAreport.

“To get an all-around and fresh take on the adoption of AFAs, we connected with more than 200 law departments and more than 200 large law firms in the U.S.,” said Kevin Iredell, vice president of research and continuing education products at ALM. “The results of this survey suggest that the billable hour remains entrenched, despite widespread reports that clients are dissatisfied with the practice. However, we also found that the vast majority of both corporate legal executives and law firm partners expect the adoption of AFAs to continue to rise in the next five years.”

According to Iredell, other highlights of the survey findings included the following:

•   Law firms’ and companies’ opinions differ as to who they think is responsible for the lag in AFA adoption. According to law firms, the top obstacle to increased use of AFA billing focuses on either side feeling more comfortable with hourly billing in general. Legal departments agree, but they go on to find lack of experience in defining and managing work and billing matters on a basis other than hourly as a big stumbling block for both parties.

•   Despite the slow adoption rate, the use of AFAs is clearly growing. About 62 percent of law firms saw an increase in the use of AFAs in 2011, with only 2 percent citing a decrease and the remainder seeing no change. Half of legal departments saw an increase, with 49 percent saying that the number remained the same and only 1 percent experiencing a decrease.

•   The top three choices for types of alternative fee arrangements used by both firms and departments were: flat fee (89 percent of departments, 93 percent of firms); blended rate (47 percent of departments, 89 percent of firms); and capped fee (57 percent of departments, 83 percent of firms)

•   About 70 percent of legal department responses predicted an increase of AFA use from 2012 to 2016, with 26 percent thinking the amount will stay the same and just 4 percent expecting a decrease. Almost three-quarters of law firms (74 percent) expect an increase in AFA work over the same time period, while 14 percent think that things will be the same and, again, just 2 percent expect a decrease.

“Both corporate counsel and law firms continue to struggle to find ways to make alternative fee arrangements work for them,” said Kris Satkunas, director of Analytic Consulting for LexisNexis CounselLink. “LexisNexis has developed advanced solutions to help both law firms and corporate legal departments identify the types of matters that best lend themselves to AFAs, to model different fee arrangements and pricing scenarios to achieve better cost predictability, and to track performance throughout the lifecycle of the engagement.”

Larry Bodine is Editor in Chief of Lawyers.com, http://blogs.lawyers.com, the top online destination for legal news that consumers can use. He is a lawyer, blogger and lifelong journalist. See http://about.me/larrybodine. Follow Larry on Twitter: @larrybodine.

 

Larry Bodine

Larry Bodine is a Business Development Advisor based in Glen Ellyn, IL. He helps law firms get more clients and earn more revenue by conducting business development training sessions, individual coaching sessions, and firm-wide strategies. He can be reached at 630.942.0977.

More Posts

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
PDF24    Send article as PDF   

Filed Under: Featured StoriesPersonal Development

Tags:

About the Author: Larry Bodine is a Business Development Advisor based in Glen Ellyn, IL. He helps law firms get more clients and earn more revenue by conducting business development training sessions, individual coaching sessions, and firm-wide strategies. He can be reached at 630.942.0977.

RSSComments (1)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. As you get an adoption lawyer, be prepared on the expenses that you may spend especially for their service. However, you can still find affordable services from other lawyers that can help you in adopting a child. Thanks for the information. Keep it up!

Leave a Reply

  • Polls