Vision for Change: Batta Fulkerson is Giving People a Reason to View Personal Injury Law Firms Under a New... Be the Missing Piece: Marketing Your Niche Law Practice: Marketing a niche practice (especially in a small firm) has its challenges. Although a... 20 Traits of the 100%- Capable Rainmaker: What does it take to be a great rainmaker, able to generate millions of dollars in... How Meditation Helped My Law Practice And Why I Think It Could Help Yours: Last year, I made equity partner at my Firm. In this blog, I have promised to tell some... Unlocking the Talents of the Millennial Lawyer: “What can I do to convince you to stay?” - So asked a senior partner during a long... Digital Marketing Trends in 2018 and Beyond: If you have seen a slump in your recent marketing efforts, you need to evaluate what you... 11 “More” SEO Specialists Share Their Best Tips for Lawyers: This is the question we posed to more than 50 SEO specialists who have done SEO for... Community News – July 2018: Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek is pleased to announce that Arezoo Jamshidi has been... Riding A Wave of Wage and Hour Class Action Litigation: California’s Leading Wage and Hour Class Action Lawyer, San Diego’s own Bill Turley... An Attorney’s Guide To Closing A Law Firm: Just like any other professional, sometimes lawyers choose to close their practices. The...
Executive Presentations-468x60-1

Attorney Gambles Chasing Fees and Loses Big

As lawyers often advise their clients, any litigation involves some element of risk, and “there is no such thing as a slam dunk.” A recent California case illustrates that when attorney fees are on the line, the stakes are increased and litigants—and their counsel—need to evaluate carefully the risks before going all-in.

In  Nemecek & Cole v. Horn, the California Second District Court of Appeal affirmed an attorney fees award, concluding a string of cases that started with a lot boundary line dispute between neighbors. By the end, the attorney at the center of these cases was more than $600,000 in debt after being ordered to pay attorney fees three separate times—once by an arbitrator and twice by two different trial court judges.

Attorneys Pursuing Unpaid Fees Risk More Than Just Losing the Case
Attorney Steven Horn was initially retained to represent a couple in a lot line dispute against their neighbors. Horn’s clients lost and failed to pay Horn’s invoice. Horn then sued his clients for unpaid fees. They counterclaimed for fraud.

“It’s almost universally the case that when attorneys sue clients over fees, the clients think of something they didn’t like that their attorneys did, and they counterclaim,” observes Betsy P. Collins, Mobile, AL, cochair of the ABA Section of Litigation’s Pretrial Practice and Discovery Committee. “Then you have a malpractice claim instead of just a fee claim,” adds Collins.

“Many attorneys and law firms are reticent to enter into fee disputes because of the danger to their reputations—if not to their financial well-being—from the counterclaims,” notes Thomas J. Donlon, Stamford, cochair of the Section of Litigation’s Appellate Practice Committee. “Even if the counterclaim is unsuccessful, the negative publicity that arises from allegations of fraud, malpractice, or malfeasance is more damaging than the amount recovered,” explains Donlon.

Horn retained Nemecek & Cole to represent him in the litigation against his former clients. The case resulted in Horn being awarded $42,282.56 on his fee claim and a matching award for his former clients on their fraud counterclaim. These awards offset, resulting in a net judgment of zero dollars. Horn’s former clients, however, sought and were ultimately awarded $380,000 in attorney fees because “they were the prevailing defendants on the complaint.” Horn settled the case for $250,000 while it was on appeal.

Know When to Fold When Attorney Fees Are in Play
Horn, undeterred by his loss to his former clients or the hefty fee award, made another litigation gamble. This time, Horn initiated arbitration against his former counsel, Nemecek, asserting that the firm’s negligence was the cause of the “disastrous results” in the litigation with his former clients. Nemecek counterclaimed for unpaid attorney fees that Horned owed to the firm.

“Having lost that first case so substantially, to then turn around and sue his next lawyer, really indicates that he didn’t analyze his situation very closely,” concludes Donlon. “When professionals are going to sue over fees, they better decide carefully what their risk is,” Collins warns. “When you’re not prevailing in a variety of forums, you are usually better off finding a different battle to spend your time on,” adds Bruce A. Rubin, Portland, OR, cochair of the Section’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee.

Horn and Nemecek were awarded nothing on their respective claims asserted in the arbitration. The arbitrator, however, found that Nemecek was entitled to $289,028.95 in attorney fees and denied any offset claimed by Horn, finding that “Nemecek was the prevailing party since they were granted virtually all the relief they sought on Horn’s claim.”

Know When to Run From a Fee Dispute
Horn, still determined despite his mounting losses, pressed on and filed a petition to vacate the arbitration award and to oppose Nemecek’s confirmation petition. The arbitration award was confirmed and, for the third time, Horn was ordered to pay fees. This time, he was required to pay his opponent’s “reasonable attorneys’ fees” in connection with the confirmation proceedings in the amount of $42,207.31.

After losing at arbitration and in the confirmation case, Horn played his last card and appealed the confirmation decision. He argued that the trial court abused its discretion because the fee award from the confirmation proceedings “was more than double the amount actually incurred” and the fee award should have been capped at the amount actually incurred. The appellate court disagreed, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and permitted Nemecek to recover its costs for the appeal from Horn, which made Horn a four-time loser in litigation that all began with a lot boundary line dispute between neighbors.

While this case is exceptional, it teaches litigants fundamental lessons to keep in mind when attorney fees are on the table. “You need to talk to your client, whether you’re on the plaintiff’s side or the defense side, about the risk of being exposed to an attorney fee award to the other side. That’s a discussion that I’m not sure happens as often as it should,” says Edward A. Salanga, Phoenix, cochair of the Section’s Expert Witnesses Committee.

“It’s not as simple as, well, if we don’t win, my client doesn’t recover anything and maybe I don’t get paid if I’m on a contingency fee agreement. In some cases, there is an additional ramification, actually exposing your client to a fee award,” explains Salanga. When attorney fees are in play, recognize, evaluate, and know the risks before gambling on litigation.

M. Derek Harris

M. Derek Harris has been named by the Atlanta Business Chronicle as a “40 Under 40 Up & Comer.” He is a Fellow in the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity’s Fellows Program, an Associate Editor for ABA Litigation News, a member of the State Bar of Georgia’s Children and the Courts Standing Committee, and a member of the Board of Directors for the Law Pipeline Program, Inc. “Attorney Gambles Chasing Fees and Loses Big,” originally published in Litigation News online, Oct. 31, 2012. © 2012 American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved.

More Posts

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
PDF24    Send article as PDF   

Filed Under: Business ManagementFeatured Stories

About the Author: M. Derek Harris has been named by the Atlanta Business Chronicle as a “40 Under 40 Up & Comer.” He is a Fellow in the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity’s Fellows Program, an Associate Editor for ABA Litigation News, a member of the State Bar of Georgia’s Children and the Courts Standing Committee, and a member of the Board of Directors for the Law Pipeline Program, Inc. “Attorney Gambles Chasing Fees and Loses Big,” originally published in Litigation News online, Oct. 31, 2012. © 2012 American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved.

RSSComments (0)

Trackback URL

Leave a Reply

  • Polls