Vision for Change: Batta Fulkerson is Giving People a Reason to View Personal Injury Law Firms Under a New... Be the Missing Piece: Marketing Your Niche Law Practice: Marketing a niche practice (especially in a small firm) has its challenges. Although a... 20 Traits of the 100%- Capable Rainmaker: What does it take to be a great rainmaker, able to generate millions of dollars in... How Meditation Helped My Law Practice And Why I Think It Could Help Yours: Last year, I made equity partner at my Firm. In this blog, I have promised to tell some... Unlocking the Talents of the Millennial Lawyer: “What can I do to convince you to stay?” - So asked a senior partner during a long... Digital Marketing Trends in 2018 and Beyond: If you have seen a slump in your recent marketing efforts, you need to evaluate what you... 11 “More” SEO Specialists Share Their Best Tips for Lawyers: This is the question we posed to more than 50 SEO specialists who have done SEO for... Community News – July 2018: Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek is pleased to announce that Arezoo Jamshidi has been... Riding A Wave of Wage and Hour Class Action Litigation: California’s Leading Wage and Hour Class Action Lawyer, San Diego’s own Bill Turley... An Attorney’s Guide To Closing A Law Firm: Just like any other professional, sometimes lawyers choose to close their practices. The...
Executive Presentations-468x60-1

RSSAuthor Archive for Daniel E. Eaton

Daniel E. Eaton, Publisher of Ethics Quarterly, is a partner in the law firm of Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, and a former Chairman of the San Diego County Bar Association’s Legal Ethics Committee. The views expressed here are his own. Comments on the list may be sent to him at eaton@scmv.com. This Commentary original appeared in Vol. 9, Issue No. 4 of Ethics Quarterly. All issues of Volume 9, as well as a cumulative index of Ethics Quarterly, may be accessed at scmv.com.

ETHICS QUARTERLY

ETHICS QUARTERLY

Among the questions answered by rulings abstracted in this issue of Ethics Quarterly are: •     Does the tripartite attorney-client privilege among an attorney, an insured, and an insurer apply where a title insurer exercises its right under an insurance policy to retain counsel for its insured, a bank, to bring an equitable subrogation action based […]

The Top 10 California Legal Ethics Rulings of 2012

The Top 10 California Legal Ethics Rulings of 2012

Volume 9 of Ethics  Quarterly abstracted 49 rulings  from California state and federal courts. The issues addressed in the ten most significant ethics-related rulings  abstracted in this volume (one of the cases is actually from the very end of 2011, too late to be included on last year’s list) range from the discoverability of attorney-directed […]

  • Polls